HEOR Strategy

Value-Based Healthcare and Procurement

Harness the tools and techniques of HEOR to demonstrate measurable value to healthcare providers

About the course

Value-based healthcare (VBHC) sets out to improve the outcomes that matter to patients relative to the cost of achieving them across the full cycle of care. For most of the two decades since Michael Porter and Elizabeth Teisberg first proposed it, VBHC has been a management philosophy pursued by providers and health systems, developing largely separately from the methodological world of health economics and outcomes research (HEOR). But today, the principles of VBHC are increasingly being used to evaluate health technologies on the basis of patient outcomes and lifecycle costs

The consequence for HEOR, market access and medical affairs professionals is immediate and practical. Evidence must now be generated of a treatment or intervention’s long-term impact across the entire patient pathway. Vendors must transition from short-term transactional sellers to long-term partners who share accountability for clinical results.

This course enables you to make that transition. It teaches you to measure outcomes and pathway costs credibly, to navigate the procurement frameworks that now govern medical technology purchasing in the UK and Europe, to construct and defend the evidence a scored tender response demands and to model the economic impact of pathway change – including the defects in value created by avoidable delay, complication and duplication.


What you’ll learn

On completion of this course you’ll be able to:

  • explain how value-based healthcare differs from health technology assessment in its unit of analysis, perspective, outcome measures and cost concept, and how HEOR methods serve both
  • select and apply the outcome measures and pathway costing methods that value-based decision-making requires, including ICHOM standard sets, patient-reported outcome and experience measures, whole life cost, microcosting and time-driven activity-based costing
  • navigate the MEAT VBP Framework and the DHSC national standard, including their value domains, weightings, scoring criteria and evidence expectations
  • construct and defend the evidence required by a value-based tender response, including agreeing baselines with buyers and avoiding the double counting of benefits across questions
  • model the economic impact of pathway redesign and quality improvement, and structure the outcome-based agreements through which value claims are contracted and monitored

How you’ll learn

This course is broken down into eight manageable weekly modules:

  • work at your own speed through a carefully curated collection of self-paced online learning materials that include video lectures, podcasts, interviews and real-world case studies
  • evidence-based research from peer-reviewed publications will help you dig more deeply into topics that really interest you
  • you are not alone – you will interact with other course members, collaborate on learning activities and get direct feedback from the course leader
  • earn professional certification by completing weekly learning activities and mini-projects

This course should take approximately 3–4 hours per week. You can expect to devote about 1–2 hours per week to self-paced learning and about 1–2 hours applying your knowledge through learning activities and case studies.


Who should take this course?

This course is designed for market access, HEOR and medical affairs professionals in the medical device, diagnostics and life science industries — particularly those who contribute to bids and tenders — and for the bid, commercial and value analysis teams who work alongside them. It is equally relevant for NHS procurement leads, category managers and commissioners, for consultants advising industry clients on value-based propositions and for clinicians and improvement leads who need to evidence the economic case for pathway change. A working familiarity with health economic evidence is helpful but no prior modelling experience is required.


About the certificates

Upon successful completion of the course you’ll receive a certificate of CPD completion. This may be useful for course members who belong to professional bodies that have Continuing Professional Development requirements. The course has an estimated 30 hours of guided learning.


How to register

Ready to start? Just click the ‘Register now’ button at the top of this page or use the ‘Ask us a question’ button if you’d like to talk to one of our course facilitators. The fee for this course is £995 per person. If you’d like to pay in instalments you can arrange this by contacting us at: [email protected].

All registrations are subject to our terms and conditions which are available here. By registering for an HEOR Institute course you are accepting these terms and conditions and agreeing to be bound by them.


 

 

Module 1: What are Value-Based Healthcare and Procurement?

This module traces value-based healthcare from its origins to its present form as a set of purchasing rules. It establishes how VBHC differs from health technology assessment and introduces the framework used throughout the course.

  • the Porter and Teisberg value equation and what became of it – the American drift into value-based payment and the very different interpretation adopted by European public health systems
  • how VBHC and HTA differ in goal, approach, outcome measure, perspective, cost concept and evidence base – and why HEOR provides the method base for both
  • the evidence on implementation – what has worked, what has not, and an honest account of measurement burden and unstable definitions of value
  • the arrival of VBHC in procurement rules across the UK and Europe, and what this means for the professionals who generate and commission evidence
  • ISPOR’s IMPACT framework – incentives, modelling, patient-centredness, assessment methods, costing and transparency — as the organising structure for this course

Module 2: Outcomes That Matter – Measurement, Standard Sets and Evidence

Value-based healthcare places outcomes in the numerator of value. This module examines how those outcomes are defined, measured and evidenced, and how they differ from the outcome measures on which health technology assessment relies.

  • outcomes that matter to patients — ICHOM standard sets, core outcome sets and Patient-Centered Core Impact Sets
  • patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) — selection, validation and interpretation
  • condition-specific versus generic measurement, and the relationship between outcome measures and health utilities
  • registries, routine datasets and hospital episode statistics as the infrastructure of outcome evidence
  • what counts as credible evidence of outcome improvement — validation, baselines and the standards that buyers apply

Module 3: Costing the Pathway – Whole Life Cost, Microcosting and Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing

Value-based decision-making replaces unit price with the cost of delivering care across a pathway or across a product’s whole life. This module teaches you to specify, commission and critique those costings.

  • why unit price is the wrong denominator, and what replaces it
  • whole life cost — purchase, implementation, operating, servicing and disposal costs, and how they are compared between bidders
  • time-driven activity-based costing — the method, the standardisation work now under way and the failure modes to watch for
  • micro-costing and statistical cost analysis, and how established HEOR costing techniques complement TDABC
  • sourcing cost data in UK and European settings — reference costs, healthcare resource groups, patient-level costing and DRG systems

Module 4: Value-Based Procurement in Europe

European public procurement law has required contracting authorities to award contracts on the basis of the most economically advantageous tender since 2014. This module examines the framework built on that requirement and how it is applied to medical technology.

  • Directive 2014/24/EU and the shift from price-based aggregation to value-based award criteria
  • the MEAT VBP Framework — its layers, categories and criteria spanning costs, outcomes, stakeholder benefits and broader societal impact
  • applying the framework in practice — selecting the criteria relevant to a specific device or consumable and defining value impact metrics for each
  • the American CQO Movement and hospital value analysis as a contrasting model
  • the framework’s central limitation — it establishes what to measure but not how to calculate it, and why that gap is precisely where HEOR earns its place

Module 5: The National Standard for Value-Based Procurement in England

In June 2026 the Department of Health and Social Care, NHS England and NHS Supply Chain published a standard set of questions and scoring criteria for the purchase of medical technology. This module works through that standard in detail.

  • the legal and policy context — the Procurement Act 2023, PPN 002, the NHS Social Value Playbook and the Provider Selection Regime
  • the five value domains — social value, efficiency, patient and staff, supply chain and purpose — and the questions contained within each
  • weighting and scoring — the minimum combined value weighting, the mandatory social value allocation, the whole life cost cap and formula, and the scoring rubric applied to every response
  • how the standard is applied across the procurement cycle — specification, pre-market engagement, evaluation, moderation and post-award measurement
  • what the standard asks of suppliers, question by question, and which of those questions are HEOR questions in all but name

Module 6: Evidencing Value Inside a Bid

This is the core practical module. Course members learn to translate an evidence base into the scored, word-limited responses that value-based procurement requires.

  • reading the question set analytically — pathway simplification, hospital and community productivity, patient experience and outcomes, health inequalities and measurement
  • baselines — agreeing them with the buyer, sourcing them from routine data and making use of the pre-market engagement window
  • the compression problem — presenting a model, its assumptions and its uncertainty within a response of 750 to 1,250 words
  • avoiding double counting — attributing each benefit to a single question and defending the boundaries between them
  • assembling the evidence dossier that sits behind the response, and anticipating how evaluators will validate the claims made

Module 7: Modelling Pathway Change and Defects in Value

HEOR professionals are increasingly asked to model not the adoption of a technology but the redesign of a pathway around it. This module addresses the methods that this different question requires.

  • from technology adoption to pathway redesign — choosing perspective, budget holder and time horizon when the intervention is a change in clinical practice
  • defects in value — quantifying the cost of avoidable delay, complication, duplication and inequity
  • the attribution problem — separating the contribution of a product from the pathway change that surrounds it
  • adapting budget impact analysis and return-on-investment modelling to pathway-level questions
  • working with clinical improvement collaboratives, registries and national audit programmes as evidence partners

Module 8: Outcome-Based Agreements and the Realisation of Value

A value claim made at tender becomes a commitment to be measured. This final module covers contracting, monitoring and the organisational realities that determine whether promised value is ever realised.

  • outcome-based and risk-sharing agreements — structures, precedents and where they have succeeded and failed in European health systems
  • contracting for expected benefits — measurement methodology, data access and the accountability problem when outcomes fall short of the promise
  • cashable versus notional savings, and the cost-shifting that occurs across organisational boundaries
  • integrated care propositions — moving from product-level value claims to portfolio-level and pathway-level ones
  • positioning an HEOR function, whether in-house or consulting, to win and deliver value-based work credibly

 

Course Leader

Benedict Stanberry

Course Factfile

  • Next session: 25 December 2026
  • Duration: 8 weeks
  • Commitment: 3-4 hours a week
  • Qualification: Certificate
  • Cost: £995
  • Location: Online

Find out more about Value-Based Healthcare and Procurement

Enquiry

More courses

All courses

Insights

  • What makes a high-quality budget impact analysis?

    August 11, 2026

    A systematic review of orphan drug budget impact analyses found most fall short of ISPOR good practice guidelines. So what separates a rigorous budget impact analysis from the rest?

  • Hello My Name Is…

    February 13, 2026

    Introducing yourself properly is surely a basic necessity if we’re to be a respectful and trusted caregiver?

Upcoming Courses

Enquiry